The study introduces the arithmetical framework to derive classical kinematic equations without using calculus and provides comparable equations for displacement. The proposed method establishes a direct correspondence between kinematic quantities—velocity, acceleration, displacement, and time—and the elements of arithmetic progressions. Conventional calculus-based methods encounter constraints when applied to systems that suffer from accuracy; thus, it indicates that there are alternate mathematical tools and methodologies. A carefully chosen arithmetic-based model is developed, treating time as continuous when studied as a sequence and as discrete when regarded in a series. Further, acceleration is modeled as a deterministic continuous quantity, while velocity and displacement follow deterministic discrete patterns. Through transforming physical correlations directly to arithmetic patterns, this framework provides alternative distance equations. Based on standard summation, a comparative analysis of a constant-acceleration problem shows that the arithmetic model predicts displacement (47 m) with about 9% more accuracy than the classical calculus result (43 m). This confirms that the method is physically valid, and it not only makes calculations easier and reduces mistakes, but it also helps people understand motion under uniform acceleration better and gives more accurate results than the calculus-based model. The results imply that the arithmetic framework offers a unified way to connect discrete and continuous motion and gives classical mechanics a new mathematical base that makes calculations clearer. Moreover, it offers fresh methods for dealing with increasingly simplifying complex physical phenomena and advancing conceptual clarity.
| Published in | International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Mathematics (Volume 11, Issue 4) |
| DOI | 10.11648/j.ijtam.20251104.12 |
| Page(s) | 65-70 |
| Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
| Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2025. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Uniform Acceleration Motion, Distance, Velocity, Discrete, Arithmetical Pattern and Calculus
| [1] | Lajos Di´ osi 1997 Coupling Classical and Quantum Variables using Continuous Quantum Measurement Theory. |
| [2] | Lepore M 2024 Heliyon A holistic framework to model student ’ s cognitive process in mathematics education through fuzzy cognitive maps Heliyon 10 e35863. |
| [3] | Zhang B, Hasanyan A D, Kellermann D and Pearce G 2023 A micropolar modelling framework for interfacial free-edge effects of heterogeneous laminates Compos. Part A 174 107703. |
| [4] | Xue Y and Bogdan P 2017 Constructing Compact Causal Mathematical Models for Complex Dynamics 97–107. |
| [5] | Gemeinhardt F, Kepler J and Informatics B 2023 Quantum Combinatorial Optimization in the NISQ Era : vol 56. |
| [6] | Greefrath G, Stefan H, Katrin S and Gabriele V 2022 Mathematical modelling and discrete mathematics : opportunities for modern mathematics teaching ZDM – Math. Educ. 54 865–79. |
| [7] | Sandefur J, Lockwood E, Hart E and Greefrath G 2022 Teaching and learning discrete mathematics ZDM – Math. Educ. 54 753–75. |
| [8] | Khan S and, Takehisa Yairi, Seiji TsutsumiS hinichi N 2024 A review of physics-based learning for system health management – ScienceDirect. |
| [9] |
Dillo T M 2025 Foundational Arithmetical Pattern Equations in Kinematics and Dynamics 2 90–114.
https://ejas.meu.edu.et/index.php/ejas_files/article/view/19 |
| [10] | Bird J 2016 Higher Engineering Mathematics (2017, Routledge). |
| [11] | Halliday D, Resnick R and Walker J 2014 Fundamentals of Physics Halliday & resnick 10ed. |
| [12] | Serway R A and John W. Jewett J 2008 Physics for Scientists and Engineers with Modern Physics ed E K E Dodd (St. Petersburg, Florida: Physical Sciences: Mary Finch, Physics and Astronomy: Charlie Hartford Development). |
| [13] | Bhattacharjee P R 2011 Discovering the Generalized Equations of Motion Int. J. Phys. Chem. Educ. 3 14–25. |
| [14] | Freedman R and Young H 2018 University Physics, Fifteenth Edition. |
| [15] | ANTON H 2012 calculus ed E Keohane (David Henderson/Getty Images 10 th EDITION CALCULUS HOWARD ANTON Drexel University IRL BIVENS Davidson College STEPHEN DAVIS Davidson College JOHN WILEY & SONS, INC.) |
APA Style
Dillo, T. M. (2025). Richness of Arithmetical Structure to Deliver Alternative Equations of Distance in Uniform Acceleration Motion. International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Mathematics, 11(4), 65-70. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijtam.20251104.12
ACS Style
Dillo, T. M. Richness of Arithmetical Structure to Deliver Alternative Equations of Distance in Uniform Acceleration Motion. Int. J. Theor. Appl. Math. 2025, 11(4), 65-70. doi: 10.11648/j.ijtam.20251104.12
@article{10.11648/j.ijtam.20251104.12,
author = {Teferi Mekit Dillo},
title = {Richness of Arithmetical Structure to Deliver Alternative Equations of Distance in Uniform Acceleration Motion},
journal = {International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Mathematics},
volume = {11},
number = {4},
pages = {65-70},
doi = {10.11648/j.ijtam.20251104.12},
url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijtam.20251104.12},
eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijtam.20251104.12},
abstract = {The study introduces the arithmetical framework to derive classical kinematic equations without using calculus and provides comparable equations for displacement. The proposed method establishes a direct correspondence between kinematic quantities—velocity, acceleration, displacement, and time—and the elements of arithmetic progressions. Conventional calculus-based methods encounter constraints when applied to systems that suffer from accuracy; thus, it indicates that there are alternate mathematical tools and methodologies. A carefully chosen arithmetic-based model is developed, treating time as continuous when studied as a sequence and as discrete when regarded in a series. Further, acceleration is modeled as a deterministic continuous quantity, while velocity and displacement follow deterministic discrete patterns. Through transforming physical correlations directly to arithmetic patterns, this framework provides alternative distance equations. Based on standard summation, a comparative analysis of a constant-acceleration problem shows that the arithmetic model predicts displacement (47 m) with about 9% more accuracy than the classical calculus result (43 m). This confirms that the method is physically valid, and it not only makes calculations easier and reduces mistakes, but it also helps people understand motion under uniform acceleration better and gives more accurate results than the calculus-based model. The results imply that the arithmetic framework offers a unified way to connect discrete and continuous motion and gives classical mechanics a new mathematical base that makes calculations clearer. Moreover, it offers fresh methods for dealing with increasingly simplifying complex physical phenomena and advancing conceptual clarity.},
year = {2025}
}
TY - JOUR T1 - Richness of Arithmetical Structure to Deliver Alternative Equations of Distance in Uniform Acceleration Motion AU - Teferi Mekit Dillo Y1 - 2025/12/09 PY - 2025 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijtam.20251104.12 DO - 10.11648/j.ijtam.20251104.12 T2 - International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Mathematics JF - International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Mathematics JO - International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Mathematics SP - 65 EP - 70 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2575-5080 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijtam.20251104.12 AB - The study introduces the arithmetical framework to derive classical kinematic equations without using calculus and provides comparable equations for displacement. The proposed method establishes a direct correspondence between kinematic quantities—velocity, acceleration, displacement, and time—and the elements of arithmetic progressions. Conventional calculus-based methods encounter constraints when applied to systems that suffer from accuracy; thus, it indicates that there are alternate mathematical tools and methodologies. A carefully chosen arithmetic-based model is developed, treating time as continuous when studied as a sequence and as discrete when regarded in a series. Further, acceleration is modeled as a deterministic continuous quantity, while velocity and displacement follow deterministic discrete patterns. Through transforming physical correlations directly to arithmetic patterns, this framework provides alternative distance equations. Based on standard summation, a comparative analysis of a constant-acceleration problem shows that the arithmetic model predicts displacement (47 m) with about 9% more accuracy than the classical calculus result (43 m). This confirms that the method is physically valid, and it not only makes calculations easier and reduces mistakes, but it also helps people understand motion under uniform acceleration better and gives more accurate results than the calculus-based model. The results imply that the arithmetic framework offers a unified way to connect discrete and continuous motion and gives classical mechanics a new mathematical base that makes calculations clearer. Moreover, it offers fresh methods for dealing with increasingly simplifying complex physical phenomena and advancing conceptual clarity. VL - 11 IS - 4 ER -